Legal Opinion

In re Murdock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1970 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Ticonderoga, Essex County.

On April 3, 1992, respondent was summarily suspended from the practice of law for "professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest” (Matter of Murdock, 182 AD2d 915, 916; see, 22 NYCRR 806.4 [fl). The underlying petition had accused him of seven charges of professional misconduct, including conversion of client funds, failure to maintain complete records of client funds or of his attorney escrow account, failure to render appropriate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. In re LoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. In re PettyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. In re ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API