Commonwealth v. Pond
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BENDER, J.:
¶ 1 David Pond appeals from the judgment of sentence of six to twenty-three months’ imprisonment imposed following his conviction for violating the verification of residence provisions of the Registration of Sexual Offenders statute, as amended, commonly referred to as Megan’s Law II. See 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9791-9799.7 (as amended May 10, 2000, effective July 9, 2000). We reverse the judgment of sentence.
¶ 2 A brief factual and procedural history follows. In 1990, Appellant was convicted of sexual crimes falling under Megan’s Law. He served his maximum prison sentence and was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. KoczwaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. BathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. McDermittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.