Legal Opinion

McCabe v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1992No. CC 89C-10234; CA A64336; SC S38591PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*607FADELEY, J.

This case concerns plaintiffs claim against the state for an unlawful employment practice alleged to consist of discrimination against plaintiff because of her sex. The Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA) requires that a plaintiff must timely notify the state of the tort claim as a condition of plaintiffs right to bring an action against the state.1 ORS 30.275 permits two types of notice: formal notice and actual notice. ORS 30.275(5) provides that formal written notice of a claim against the state may be given only to the office of the Director of the Department of General Services…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Computer Concepts, Inc. v. BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lommasson v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. McCabe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Plumeau v. School District #40Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Draper v. Astoria School District No. 1CDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
  4. Shepard v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  5. Mathews v. Federated Service InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API