Mohr v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea
This Court accepted jurisdiction of relator’s application for a writ of supervisory control directed to the Missoula County District Court. The relator, as a plaintiff in a personal injury action, had moved the trial court for a protective order to the effect that in granting the defendant’s motion under Rule 35, M.R.Civ.P., the trial court should permit plaintiff’s counsel to be present in the examining room. The trial court denied the motion and the plaintiff filed a petition in this Court asking for a writ of supervisory control.
We hold that the party’s attorney has a right to be present…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sharff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Dziwanoski v. Ocean Carriers Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- Williams v. Chattanooga Iron WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Bowing v. Delaware Rayon Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Mapes v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Langfeldt-Haaland v. Saupe Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Hegwood v. Montana Fourth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Sprinkle v. BurtonMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Langfeldt-Haaland v. Saupe Enterprises, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.