Legal Opinion

Langfeldt-Haaland v. Saupe Enterprises, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1989No. S-2387Published

1Opinion of the Court

768 P.2d 1144 (1989)

Svend LANGFELDT-HAALAND, Petitioner,

v.

SAUPE ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent.

No. S-2387.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

February 17, 1989.

Joseph L. Paskvan, Hoppner & Paskvan, Fairbanks, for petitioner.

Susan M. West, Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, Anchorage, Howard Staley, Staley, DeLisio, Cook & Sherry, Fairbanks, for respondent.

Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

This petition raises the question whether an attorney for a plaintiff in a personal injury case is entitled to attend or tape record a Civil Rule 35[1] medical…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lee v. County Ct. of Erie CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Houston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. McCracken v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Shepard v. BoweOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Otton v. ZaboracAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API