Legal Opinion

Salas v. United States

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 7, 1995No. 94-CV-62HPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The parties have consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this case, including entry of judgement. Defendant has moved for an order directing plaintiff to comply with the requirements for pretrial disclosure of expert testimony set forth in Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with respect to her treating physicians who are expected to testify at trial. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

This action was filed on January 26,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  2. Baker v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1995
  3. Patel v. GayesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Widhelm v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1995

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Downey v. Bob's Discount Furniture Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. Bank of China, New York Branch v. Nbm LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Hendrix v. Evenflo Co.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2009
  4. Mangla v. University of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
  5. Bank of China v. NBM LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API