Churchill v. City of Albuquerque
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
This is an appeal arid cross-appeal from a supplemental order in a workmen’s compensation case, increasing the term of disability but at the same time refusing to increase the percentage of compensation.
The case was originally tried before a jury which found on October 4, 1955, that the claimant was partially disabled in the amount of 50% and that his disability would continue for a period of 250 weeks.
No further proceedings were taken until December 5, 1957, when a motion was filed by the claimant to re-open the judgment on the grounds (1) that by reason of action of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Segura v. Jack Adams General ContractorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Smith v. Spence & Son Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Rowland v. Reynolds Electrical Engineering Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Rakiec v. New Haven Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3Cited by15 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- St. Clair v. County of GrantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Eberline Instrument Corp. v. FelixNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Henington v. Technical-Vocational InstituteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.