Legal Opinion

Churchill v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1959No. 6545PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Justice.

This is an appeal arid cross-appeal from a supplemental order in a workmen’s compensation case, increasing the term of disability but at the same time refusing to increase the percentage of compensation.

The case was originally tried before a jury which found on October 4, 1955, that the claimant was partially disabled in the amount of 50% and that his disability would continue for a period of 250 weeks.

No further proceedings were taken until December 5, 1957, when a motion was filed by the claimant to re-open the judgment on the grounds (1) that by reason of action of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Segura v. Jack Adams General ContractorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Smith v. Spence & Son Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rowland v. Reynolds Electrical Engineering Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rakiec v. New Haven Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  2. Durham v. Gulf Interstate Engineering CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. St. Clair v. County of GrantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Eberline Instrument Corp. v. FelixNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Henington v. Technical-Vocational InstituteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API