Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Reynolds Electrical Engineering Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1951No. 5388PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON. Justice.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The claimant appeals from a judgment denying total permanent disability, plus 50 per cent additional compensation by reason of the failure of the employer to provide reasonable safety devices as required by the Act.

On May 24, 1949, the claimant, an employee of the Reynolds Electrical Engineering Co., while engaged in connecting several lengths of three inch pipe to be used in encasing conduit, sustained an injury to the middle finger of the left hand. Previously, he had screwed the pipe together by hand but it was…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cahill v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. La Rue v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Flippo v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  4. J. H. W. Steele Co. v. DoverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Allen Gravel Co. v. YarbroughMississippi Supreme Court · 1923

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mann v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Churchill v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Dudley v. Ferguson Trucking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Benavides v. E. N.M. Med. Ctr.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Ennen v. Southwest Potash CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API