Legal Opinion

Smith v. Spence & Son Drilling Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1956No. 6097PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The defendants below being the employer and insurer in the trial of a claim for Workmen’s Compensation prosecuted before the district court of Eddy County, complain before this court, as appellants, of a judgment rendered against them upon the verdicts of a jury returned into court at the conclusion of the trial.

The injury on account of which the claim is prosecuted took place on April 3, 1954. The plaintiff was 37 years of age at time of the accidental injury of which he complains.'- He .was married and the father of two children. He had substituted for another man on two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lipe v. BradburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gilbert v. E. B. Law & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Gerrard v. Harvey & Newman Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. New Mexico State Highway Department v. BibleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lozano v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ortega v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Romero v. H. A. Lott, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Rhodes v. Cottle Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API