Legal Opinion

Eberline Instrument Corp. v. Felix

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1985No. 15771PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIORDAN, Justice.

Petitioners Eberline Instrument Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Company, (Eberline) appealed a worker’s compensation award, claiming that the trial court applied an incorrect hourly rate when computing benefits due. Respondent Chris W. Felix, (Felix) cross-appealed raising various issues. The Court of Appeals ruled against Eberline. We granted Eberline’s petition for certiorari, and now reverse the Court of Appeals.

The issue on certiorari is whether compensation benefits should be computed based on the average weekly wage that a workman is earning at the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Medina v. Zia CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Thornton v. GambleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Aranda v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Quintana v. Trotz Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Griego v. Bag 'N Save Food EmporiumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Duran v. Albuquerque Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Justiz v. Walgreen'sNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Vinyard v. Palo Alto, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Livingston v. Environmental EarthscapesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API