Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Forsythe & Templar

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 1916No. 5506PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from County Court, Stephens County; J. W. Marshall, Judge. Action by Forsythe & Templar and others against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant Railway Company brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

.Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action by For-sythe & Templar, a copartnership, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company and various other parties, hereinafter called defendants, for the loss of 23 hogs under an interstate shipment from Comanche, Okla., to Ft. Worth, Tex. For reasons not. disclosed by the record, an amended petition was filed by plaintiffs, and in said amended petition all of said defendants, other than the railway company, were eliminated from said cause.

The material evidence shows that said hogs were delivered by plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Phillips v. United States Benevolent SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kierstead v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Cole v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Grooms v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Benzel v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API