Hinsman v. Marble Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.
When this case was last before us, it was remanded for the express purpose of affording the plaintiff an opportunity to show that there had been a re-entry for a breach of the covenant for using the premises in a good, husband-like manner. Pursuant to this mandate, a rehearing was had, supplementary findings were made, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and the case comes back to us on the defendant’s exceptions.
It is now shown by the record that the justice ejectment suit was predicated upon three grounds, one of which was that the defendant had breached the covenant requiring it to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hinsman v. Marble Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Hinsman v. Marble Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Feneck v. NowakowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Mongeon Bay Properties, LLC v. Mallets Bay Homeowner's Assn., Anthony J. Sineni and Merrimack Mortagage Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Spaulding v. HE Fletcher CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Zurmuhlen v. UchidaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Prescott v. SmitsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.