Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. HE Fletcher Company

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 6, 1964No. 1223PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is an action of tort. The plaintiff alleging to be the assignee of certain reserved rights to a granite quarry in the Town of Plymouth, seeks conpensatory and punative damages from the defendant for granite removed by it from the quarry which the plaintiff claims to be hers by virtue of the claimed assignment. Trial was had in the Windsor County Court. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the court below granted defendant’s motion for a verdict to be directed in its favor. This appeal is not only from the verdict and judgment but from the ruling of the trial court excluding from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. University of Vermont & State Agricultural College v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Manley Brothers Co., Inc. v. SomersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Tomasi v. KelleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  4. Smith v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Sowles v. ButlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. H. P. Hood & Sons v. HeinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  2. Galkin v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Eastwood v. SheddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Merritt v. MerrittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. Obuchowski v. Davis (In Re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API