Legal Opinion

Prescott v. Smits

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 13, 1985No. 84-184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This case asks us to determine the nature and duration of a tenancy created by entry under a lease agreement which is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds. The superior court found that a year-to-year tenancy was created and adjudged the defendants liable for one year’s rent less payments made. We affirm.

In early 1982, defendants-appellants, Dirk Smits and Kay Smits, approached plaintiffs-appellees, Richard Prescott and Nancy Prescott, and inquired about leasing the Prescotts’ farm located in Panton, Vermont. The parties negotiated the lease agreement over a two-month period. Defendants,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cliche v. ClicheSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  2. Lanphere v. BeedeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. Roseneau Foods, Inc. v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Fyles v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Barlow v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Starr Farm Beach Campowners Ass'n v. BoylanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  2. Milligan v. MilliganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. Bigelow v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Stoltz v. Brattleboro Housing Authority (In Re Stoltz)District Court, D. Vermont · 1998
  5. nye v. boissonneault family farmVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API