Hinsman v. Marble Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
By an instrument dated January 29, 1908, John A. Mead, now deceased, leased to the Marble Savings Bank a part of the so-called Mead Building in the city of Rutland. This lease ran for a period of twenty years from September 1, 1907. At some time prior to this suit, the bank vacated the premises and verbally leased the rooms it had occupied to the defendant Segale, who is now in possession running a fruit and vegetable store therein. On August 4, 1925, the plaintiffs, who have succeeded to the rights of Mead, brought this action in Rutland city court under G. L. 2146 to recover the possession…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Powell v. MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Nave v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Kahn v. WilhelmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Fillmore v. Estate of MorganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
- Hadley v. HavensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
3Cited by10 opinions
- Downtown Barre Development v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Mongeon Bay Properties, LLC v. Mallets Bay Homeowner's Assn., Anthony J. Sineni and Merrimack Mortagage Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Hinsman v. Marble Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Hinsman v. Marble Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Hunt v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.