Legal Opinion
Hinsman v. Marble Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 1, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
This is an action in contract, brought to recover for the violation of certain covenants, express and implied, contained in a lease of real estate. Trial was by court, and after finding the facts, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff to recover. one cent damages and costs. Both parties excepted.
The following appears in the finding of facts: The plaintiff is the owner of a business block in the city of Rutland, known as the Mead Building. It was erected in 1907 by her father, Dr. John A. Mead from whose estate she acquired title. A part of the building was specially constructed for use as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Michaels v. . FishelNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- O'Boyle v. Parker-Young Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Rice v. Bennington County Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Powell v. MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Boston El. Ry. Co. v. Grach & Hyde Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Downtown Barre Development v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Brattleboro Retreat v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Houghton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- State v. CainSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- St. Albans Hospital v. City of St. AlbansSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.