Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. N.G.T.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1999No. S-8187PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this paternity case, the Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) seeks to establish Howard Meyer’s parentage of N.G.T. The superior court granted summary judgment to CSED, ruling that Meyer is N.G.T.’s biological father. Meyer appeals, arguing that his denial of intercourse with N.G.T.’s mother during the possible period of conception created a genuine issue of material fact. Because we agree that Meyer’s denial of intercourse creates a question of fact sufficient to withstand summary judgment, we reverse the superior court’s decision and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. R.E. ex rel. D.E. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API