Legal Opinion
Hill v. AMMC, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 2018No. S-17-1075PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
The Lancaster County District Court dismissed an action filed by Michelle M. Hill, finding it was barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. Hill filed this timely appeal. We affirm.
I. FACTS
1. HILL'S 2016 COMPLAINT
On July 14, 2016, Hill filed a complaint in the district court for Lancaster County against her former employer, AMMC, Inc., doing business as Morrissey Motor Company. The complaint presented two claims: one alleging a violation of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 1 and the other alleging "wrongful discharge ... in violation of Nebraska law and public policy."
According to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Spring Creek Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Hess Bakken Inv., II, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Allianz Risk Transfer AGCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- Scott Martel v. George F. Stafford, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schaeffer v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- Harrington v. StrongDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
- Doerr v. ChaffeeNebraska Court of Appeals · 2021
- Alliance Group v. NGC GroupNebraska Court of Appeals · 2021
- Applied Underwriters v. Milan Express Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.