Legal Opinion

Woodard v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1999No. S-97-241PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

This is a negligence action brought pursuant to the Nebraska Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1991 & Cum. Supp. 1992). The suit arose out of a collision between appellee City of Lincoln’s “Handi-Bus,” driven by appellee Virgil L. Wells, and appellant Philip H. Woodard. Philip was struck by the Handi-Bus while riding his bicycle in a crosswalk at the intersection of 28th and D Streets and Capitol Parkway in Lincoln. Philip is suing the City of Lincoln (City) and Wells for damages arising from the collision. Bessie Woodard, Philip’s wife,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. HemenwayNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bohl v. Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Barnett v. PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Chicago Lumber Co. v. School District No. 71Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Miss. Dept. of Public Safety v. StringerMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Knoll v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Manker v. MankerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rauscher v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Capitol City Telephone, Inc. v. Nebraska Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API