Legal Opinion
Litherland v. Jurgens
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 2015No. S-14-818PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
- 775 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 291 Nebraska R eports LITHERLAND v. JURGENS Cite as
291 Neb. 775
Janice K. Litherland, appellant, v. Gary M artin Jurgens and Velda Lee Lenners, appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed September 11, 2015. No. S-14-818. 1. Motions to Dismiss: Appeal and Error. A district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo. 2. Motions to Dismiss: Pleadings: Appeal and Error. When reviewing an order dismissing a complaint, an appellate court accepts as true all facts which are well pled and the proper and reasonable inferences of law and fact which may be drawn…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- DeWitt v. DuceSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Robinson v. First State Bank of MonticelloIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Goff v. Harold Ives Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Huffey v. LeaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holloway v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Cisneros v. GrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Briggs v. Briggs (In re Certification of Court)South Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Harring v. GressNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- In re Estate of LahrNebraska Court of Appeals · 2023