Myers v. City of Oakdale
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
The Veterans Preference Hearing Board (board) concluded that the city’s discharge of Robert Myers was reasonable and that no extenuating circumstances existed to justify a modification. The board further concluded that Myers was not entitled to back wages. The trial court reversed the board, ruling that there were extenuating circumstances that justified modification of the discharge and that the board did not have jurisdiction to decide the issue of back wages. The city appealed. We affirm as to back wages and reverse as to modification of discharge.
FACTS
Robert W. Myers…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Ekstedt v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. SchraderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bolden v. Hennepin County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Myers v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991