Legal Opinion

Myers v. City of Oakdale

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1990No. C2-90-860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

The Veterans Preference Hearing Board (board) concluded that the city’s discharge of Robert Myers was reasonable and that no extenuating circumstances existed to justify a modification. The board further concluded that Myers was not entitled to back wages. The trial court reversed the board, ruling that there were extenuating circumstances that justified modification of the discharge and that the board did not have jurisdiction to decide the issue of back wages. The city appealed. We affirm as to back wages and reverse as to modification of discharge.

FACTS

Robert W. Myers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Ekstedt v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. SchraderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolden v. Hennepin County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Myers v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API