Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
We granted appellant’s petition for review for the purpose of determining the scope of power of a hearing board proceeding under the Veterans Preference Act, Minn. Stat. § 197.46 (1984). The Court of Appeals held that an ad hoc hearing board proceeding under the Veterans Preference Act had no power, once it found that the employee’s conduct constituted misconduct, to modify the disciplinary sanction proposed by the employer. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Schrader, 380 N.W.2d 169 (Minn.App.1986). We reverse. We also review the hearing board’s extenuating…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Leininger v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Ramsey County Community Human Services Department v. DavilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. SchraderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by13 opinions
- Annandale Advocate v. City of AnnandaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- City of Saint Paul v. EldredgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- City of Saint Paul v. EldredgeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Pawelk v. Camden TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.