Bolden v. Hennepin County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus, respecting payment of overtime wages lost during the pendency of a dispute over respondent’s decision to reassign him to a shorter work week. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Eddie Bolden is an honorably discharged veteran, and has been employed by Hennepin County since 1985. Following an allegation of sexual misconduct, the county notified appellant in April 1992 that it intended to discharge him from employment.
Appellant requested a veteran’s preference hearing. The county then reassigned…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leininger v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Pawelk v. Camden TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Longman v. KachelmacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Goar v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Myers v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990