Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Hennepin County Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 1993No. C3-93-557Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus, respecting payment of overtime wages lost during the pendency of a dispute over respondent’s decision to reassign him to a shorter work week. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Eddie Bolden is an honorably discharged veteran, and has been employed by Hennepin County since 1985. Following an allegation of sexual misconduct, the county notified appellant in April 1992 that it intended to discharge him from employment.

Appellant requested a veteran’s preference hearing. The county then reassigned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leininger v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Pawelk v. Camden TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Longman v. KachelmacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Goar v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Myers v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API