Legal Opinion

Myers v. City of Oakdale

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1991No. C0-90-1652Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

The trial court concluded Myers was entitled to payment of back wages and benefits from the time he was discharged until the Veterans Preference Board issued its decision. The trial court also determined the City of Oakdale is permitted to offset wages owed to Myers by the amount of PERA and Mil benefits which he received. However, the City was not allowed to offset those wages by the amount of the private no-fault insurance benefits Myers received. The City appealed. We reverse as to Myers’ entitlement to back wages and benefits.

FACTS

Robert W. Myers (Myers) is an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Service Oil, Inc. v. TriplettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Mitlyng v. WolffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Lewis v. Minneapolis Board of Education, Special School District 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API