Legal Opinion

Kubasinski v. Johnson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1973No. Docket 12364PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

This is an appeal of right from a directed verdict against plaintiff in an automobile accident case. Plaintiff is a cyclist.* 1 Defendant is the operator of the involved motor vehicle.

In this state in all but rare instances the questions of negligence and proximate causality are for the jury where, as here, one has been demanded. Comstock v General Motors Corp, 358 Mich 163 (1959); Martiniano v Booth, 359 Mich 680 (1960). Justice Smith in McKinney v Yelavich 352 Mich 687, 692 (1958), expressed it thus:

"Only under the most extreme circumstances, those, in fact, where reasonable minds could not…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. McKinney v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. McKinney v. YelavichMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Meier v. HoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Koehler v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wilhelm v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Cryderman v. Soo Line Railroad Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Robertson v. Swindell-Dressler Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Detroit Bank & Trust Co. v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API