Legal Opinion
H. N. Bailey & Associates v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 15, 1971No. 530-69PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Judge: *
This is a contract action wherein this court, by cross motions for summary judgment, has been asked to review a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) in accordance with the standards established by the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 (1964). Jurisdiction is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1491.
The ASBCA upheld the Contracting Officer’s decision to terminate the plaintiff’s contract for default as well as his assessment of excess reprocurement costs in the amount of $2,510.20. Plaintiff asks us to hold that the termination for default was improper,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Sol O. Schlesinger, Doing Business as Ideal Uniform Cap Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Cities Service Helex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Spirit Leveling Contractors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.