Legal Opinion

Cheesman v. Odermott

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1952No. Civ. 8060PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This appeal is on the judgment roll from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action brought by plaintiffs who sought to enjoin defendants from discharging irrigation waters into a natural watercourse which traverses the lands of plaintiffs to their alleged damage.

The trial court found as follows: The area in question lies to the. northeast of the city of Galt in Sacramento County and the lands of respondents lie to the east of and are higher in elevation than those of the appellants. The lands of all the parties are part of the same watershed. Surface waters, that is, waters naturally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Oakdale Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mogle v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fell v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Reclamation Dist. No. 833 v. American F. Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bryant v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Poole v. OlavesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Amador Valley Investors v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Phillips v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Martinson v. HugheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Smith v. King Creek Grazing Ass'nIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API