Allen v. Employment Department
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, P. J.
Petitioner contends that the fee required by ORS 21.010 for filing a petition for judicial review in this court violates Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, which requires that “justice shall be administered, openly and without purchase * * We initially denied, by unpublished order, petitioner’s request to waive the filing fee. Petitioner has petitioned for reconsideration of that decision. We grant petitioner’s petition for reconsideration and, on reconsideration, conclude that the uniform filing fee prescribed by ORS 21.010 does not violate the Justice Without Purchase Clause…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Northern Counties Trust v. SearsOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Ortwein v. SchwabOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Bailey v. FrushOregon Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Bell v. City of Hood RiverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Walker v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Bova v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Walker v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025