Bell v. City of Hood River
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s dismissal of a declaratory judgment action that they brought against the City of Hood River and a developer, NBW Hood River, LLC. Plaintiffs sought to have declared unconstitutional, under Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, the city’s imposition of a nonwaivable fee that must be paid to appeal land use decisions of the city’s planning commission to the city council. On the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court concluded that Article I, section 10, did not apply to the city’s fee and dismissed plaintiffs’ action. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Oregonian Publishing Co. v. DeizOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Oregonian Publishing Co. v. O'LearyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- W. Radio Servs. Co. v. Verizon Wireless (Vaw), LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Schroeder v. Clackamas Cnty. BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018