Bradley v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Plaintiffs1 filed a petition for a way of necessity to acquire road access to their landlocked property over state land owned by the Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) near the coast in Clatsop County. A plaintiff who seeks a way of necessity over state-owned land cannot receive road access unless the state grants permission for the way of necessity under ORS 376.185. ORS 376.180(11). In turn, ORS 376.185 provides that the state “shall not unreasonably withhold” the required consent for a way of necessity. ODF denied plaintiffs its consent due to its concerns that the access road would harm…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas Creek Lumber v. Dept. of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Walker v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Thomas Creek Lumber v. Dept. of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Walker v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025