Legal Opinion
Sachs v. Regal Savings Bank, FSB
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 14, 1998No. 757, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
When both sides in a case move for summary judgment, the trial judge must be prepared to shift perspective quickly and decisively before moving from the resolution of one of the motions to the resolution of the other. A single view of what is before the court will not do.
The appellant, Stewart D. Sachs, sued the appellee, Regal Savings Bank, FSB, et al., in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, for breach of an employment contract. After discovery had been completed, both the appellant and the appellee moved for summary judgment. The circuit court denied the appellant’s motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Shapiro v. MassengillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Southland Corp. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Swedish Civil Aviation Admin. v. Project Management Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Samuels v. TschechtelinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Thomas W. Gresham v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Jay Dee/Mole Joint Venture v. Mayor & City CouncilDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Regal Savings Bank v. SachsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.