Shapiro v. Massengill
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLANDER, Judge.
“An eminent lawyer cannot be a dishonest man,” Daniel Webster once said.1 This thought underlies the employment dispute between two attorneys—one who fired an associate out of distrust for his integrity and his judgment, and the other who claims he was defamed and wrongly discharged. Appellant Steven A. Shapiro was terminated from employment by appellees Alan D. Massengill and Alan D. Massengill, P.A. because, during employment negotiations, Shapiro did not *750inform Massengill that his former employer was under federal investigation for fraud involving a contract with which…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Carl Stern v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Towson University v. ConteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Samuels v. TschechtelinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Wholey v. RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Donn Milton, Dr. v. Iit Research InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.