Legal Opinion

Yuma County v. Hanneman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1934No. Civil No. 3361PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal by Yuma county, hereinafter called defendant, from a judgment in favor of E. L. Hanneman, hereinafter called plaintiff. The facts necessary for the determination of the appeal are not seriously in question and may be stated as follows:

Plaintiff on October 19, 1932, filed his complaint for goods, wares, and merchandise which he alleged his assignor had sold to Yuma county. Summons was duly issued and served upon defendant on the 20th of October. No appearance or answer was made by defendant up to the 12th of November, and on that date a default was regularly entered by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. PierseMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hunt v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Yavapai County v. O'NeillArizona Supreme Court · 1892
  4. County of Greenlee v. WebsterArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hill County v. Shaw & Borden Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Palmcroft Development Co. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. PrintzArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Russell County v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Town of Holbrook v. GirandArizona Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API