Legal Opinion

Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 31, 2004No. 1 CA-CV 03-0001PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statute (“A.R.S.”) section 11-254.01(A) (2001) requires counties to procure contractual services over a specified dollar value, other than professional services, by sealed, competitive bids. To decide the appeal in this legal malpractice case, we must delineate the “professional services” that are exempt from the competitive bid requirement. After resolving that issue and others, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On July 15, 1996, La Paz County and appellant Western Corrections Group, Inc. (“WCG”) entered in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Harris v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Mousa v. SabaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Ground Control, LLC v. Capsco Industries, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Salerno v. EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API