Legal Opinion

Town of Holbrook v. Girand

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1938No. Civil No. 3973PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action by James B. Girand, hereinafter called plaintiff, against the town of Holbrook, a municipal corporation hereinafter called defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $1,200, and defendant appealed.

The facts as shown by the record may be stated as follows: The town of Holbrook, during the year 1933, became interested in securing funds from the Public Works Administration, hereinafter called the PWA, to improve its water system. Learning of this fact, plaintiff, on October 9th of that year, wrote to the city clerk suggesting that he be employed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. County of Greenlee v. WebsterArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hill County v. Shaw & Borden Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  4. Yuma County v. HannemanArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Barron G. Collier, Inc. v. PaddockArizona Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Mohave County v. Mohave-Kingman Estates, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Freeman v. Wintroath Pumps—Division of Worthington Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Fund Manager v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API