Legal Opinion

State v. Pirouzkar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 11, 1989No. 10-82-06549 10-82-06550 CA A47948 (Control) CA A47949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals from felony convictions for unlawfully obtaining public assistance. ORS 411.630. She assigns as error the trial court’s denial of her motions to dismiss for failure to prosecute timely and the denial of her motion for a mistrial because of statements made by the prosecutor during closing arguments. We affirm.

Defendant was indicted in August, 1982, for offenses alleged to have occurred in August and October, 1981. Arrest warrants were issued at that time. In October, 1982, the warrants were entered in local, regional and national law enforcement computer systems that are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. LundbomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. SchwabCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RohlfingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. State v. ChinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. GuritzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. HinkleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. HuskeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API