Legal Opinion

State v. Hinkle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 2009No. MI000139; A133779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.

Defendant appeals a conviction for second-degree theft. ORS 164.045. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss on the ground that the prosecution against him was not commenced within the applicable statutory period of limitations. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm defendant’s conviction.

On January 2, 2000, defendant stole more than $50 in cash from the Sno Cap Drive-In restaurant in Redmond. He was apprehended by two Redmond Police Officers, issued a “Uniform Traffic Citation and Complaint” (UTC) charging him with second-degree theft, and released. The UTC…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Abbott v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. PirouzkarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AnglinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. BerrellezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. MelecioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API