Legal Opinion
State v. Chinn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 21, 1992No. C88-06-33770; CA A70557PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*664EDMONDS, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. He argues1 that his prosecution is time-barred under ORS 131.135 because of an unreasonable delay in executing the warrant for his arrest and that the court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss the indictment on that basis. We affirm.
The indictment alleges a theft occurring on or between March 9,1986, and December 26,1987. The victim was the Oregon Employment Division (Division). An arrest warrant was issued on June 3, 1988, the same day that the indictment was returned. The. warrant was served on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. MendeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. DykastOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. RohlfingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. KirschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. ChelemedosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.