Legal Opinion

State v. Rohlfing

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 15, 1998No. 87-12-37357; CA A94743PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He claims that the eight-year delay between his indictment and arrest denied him his statutory and constitutional right to a speedy trial. We reverse.

On November 2, 1987, defendant was seen running away from a house that had been burglarized and was later identified by the victim during a show-up identification while being questioned regarding another matter. During the questioning, the police obtained defendant’s address and phone number. On December 17, 1987, defendant was indicted for burglary in the first…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. IvoryOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. EmeryOregon Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sharp Ex Rel. Gordon v. Case Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. KirschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. DavidsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. State v. FleetwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API