Legal Opinion

State v. Schwab

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 1989No. C87-07-33789; CA A46832PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. He contends that the court erred by not granting his motion for mistrial and by imposing a condition of probation that allows his probation officer to search him, his home and his vehicle. We affirm the conviction and remand for reconsideration.

The facts relevant to this appeal are not disputed. Defendant was indicted for the theft of jewelry from an acquaintance. He testified on direct examination that he had previously been convicted of robbery in the third degree and provided a brief description of the incident.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. PirouzkarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API