Legal Opinion
State v. Norman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 7, 2005No. 030343136; A122051PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for misdemeanor driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. On appeal, he assigns error to the admission into evidence of certifications of the accuracy of the Intoxilyzer machine that produced the test result also admitted into evidence. He argues that his confrontation rights under the state and federal constitutions were violated in light of recent Oregon Supreme Court holdings and the holding in Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004). We affirm.
The underlying facts are not in dispute.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. CarterMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MacKOregon Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. RawlinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bohsancurt v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.