State v. MacK
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
The question that this case presents is whether the federal Confrontation Clause prohibits a Department of Human Services (DHS) caseworker from testifying to statements that a three-year-old child made to her during a police-directed interview. We hold that it does and affirm the trial court’s order excluding that evidence.
The state charged defendant with murdering his girlfriend’s two-year-old son Lucas. The autopsy revealed evidence of blunt force trauma to Lucas’s head and face and described the cause of death as injuries consistent with smothering by facial compression. Lucas’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. PinnellOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- People v. CageCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. VigilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- State v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- State v. JustusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State v. SilerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.