Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1985No. CC 10-81-02891, 10-81-02892; CA A26455; SC S30758PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*635JONES, J.

This is a review of a criminal conviction. The issue is whether hearsay testimony by the mother of a three-year-old declarant who is the alleged victim of sexual abuse is admissible in evidence. We hold that under the facts of this case part of the testimony was admissible and part not if the defendant’s confrontation rights are satisfied.

Defendant was convicted after a non-jury trial of two counts of Sodomy in the First Degree1 based upon a written confession of the defendant and the testimony of the mother of the victim relating to the court the child’s statements made later in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. LicataMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API