Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Lou Taylor, Inc. And Mr. T., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1977No. 77-1542PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The National Labor Relations Board (Board) petitions for enforcement of its order that Lou Taylor, Inc. and Mr. T., Inc. (Company) cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices. The Board found that the Company violated section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) (1970), by promising benefits immediately before a representation election and granting those benefits after the union lost the election and that it violated section 8(a)(3) and (1), NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(3) and (1) (1970), by not recalling a pro-union employee after he was laid off for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sweeney & Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. Arthur Collier, D/B/A Arthur Collier Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corporation D/B/A Hotel FontainebleauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Delchamps, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Trencor, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Trencor, Inc v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Trencor, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Trencor, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997