Feeney v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[T1] After conditionally pleading guilty to a controlled substance offense, Patrick Feeney (the appellant) challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a search of the vehicle he was driving. He maintains that he was detained in violation of his constitutional rights. - Concluding the highway patrol trooper had reasonable suspicion to justify detaining the appellant after the original purpose of the traffic stop had ended, we affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] The sole issue presented for our review is whether the appellant's right to be free…