Legal Opinion

State v. Steele

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1974No. 7421SC729PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

In his first assignment of error the defendant contends that the trial court committed error by repeatedly intervening with comments and questions with such regularity and in such a manner as to amount to an expression of opinion by the court and by assuming the role of prosecutor in sustaining his own objections, all in violation of G.S. 1-180. Altogether the trial judge intervened with questions or comments well over 100 times. After examining the record closely, we feel compelled to sustain this assignment of error.

“G.S. 1-180 imposes on the trial judge the duty of absolute…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. . OwenbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. DouglasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Everette v. DO BRIGGS LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WiseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. RedfernCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API