Legal Opinion
Lee v. Travelers Insurance Company
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1962No. 3043PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
This action was brought by appellant Lee against Nicholson and Herian for damages for injuries received by Lee while a passenger in an automobile owned by Nicholson and operated by Herian. Appellant was awarded judgment in a substantial amount and then through garnishment proceedings sought to collect the judgment from appellee Travelers Insurance Company. From a judgment in favor of the insurance company this appeal was brought.
The garnishment proceedings were submitted to the trial court on a written stipulation of facts which disclosed the following. The accident occurred…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weller v. CumminsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Slavens v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- BARRELLA, ETC. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
3Cited by12 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers International UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Diamond Service Co. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sidibe v. Traveler's InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Capitol Speciality Insurance v. Sanford Wittels & Heisler, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- MDB Communications, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.