Legal Opinion
Capitol Speciality Insurance v. Sanford Wittels & Heisler, LLP
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 27, 2011No. Civil Action 10-2079 (ESH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation (“Capitol Specialty”) brings this action against Sanford Wittels & Heisler, LLP and David Sanford (collectively “Defendants”) seeking declaratory relief from coverage on a elaims-made-and-reported liability insurance policy issued to the law firm for the policy period of December 10, 2007 to December 10, 2008 (the “Policy”). Plaintiff seeks a judicial determination that the Policy does not provide coverage for a legal malpractice action now pending against Sanford Wittels for which…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Talavera v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago Insurance Company v. Paulson & Nace, PLLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Chicago Insurance Company v. Paulson & Nace, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Silver v. American Safety Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- 1426 Wisconsin LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. All Plumbing, Inc. Service, Parts, InstallationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.