Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Morris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1929No. 5824PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
The appellee, having been injured in an automobile accident and recovered judgment for damages against one Gomez, the renter and driver of the car, who was charged with negligence resulting in the accident, brought this action against the appellant as the insurance carrier. The insurance policy involved contains a provision that the insolvency or bankruptcy of the assured does not operate to release the insurance company from the payment of damages, and that in ease of a judgment against the insured and return of an execution thereon unsatisfied, “an action may be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Slavens v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. ColthurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
3Cited by24 opinions
- Home Indemnity Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Hallman v. Marquette Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- General Casualty & Surety Co. v. KiersteadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co. v. Independence Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.