Stephenson v. Kenworthy Grain & Milling Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This is an action to recover damages arising ont of a written contract for the sale of hay. The contract, which is dated August 18, 1934, is in the form of a written memorandum addressed to respondent, the material part of which reads:
“We confirm Purchase from you today of about 200
tons No. 1 first 2nd & 3rd cut alfa
at $11.00 per ton basis Ranch
Buyer Paying Bail & Haul
Shipment October after 3rd through sweat
Subject to .....................................................................
Terms .................................................................................
' “It is understood…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clise Investment Co. v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Cannon v. Oregon Moline Plow Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Foss v. Golden Rule BakeryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Brinnon Logging Co. v. Carlsborg Mill & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Pickford v. BorlandWashington Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Wenatchee Production Credit Ass'n v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
- Irwin v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936