Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Kenworthy Grain & Milling Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1936No. 25973. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an action to recover damages arising ont of a written contract for the sale of hay. The contract, which is dated August 18, 1934, is in the form of a written memorandum addressed to respondent, the material part of which reads:

“We confirm Purchase from you today of about 200

tons No. 1 first 2nd & 3rd cut alfa

at $11.00 per ton basis Ranch

Buyer Paying Bail & Haul

Shipment October after 3rd through sweat

Subject to .....................................................................

Terms .................................................................................

' “It is understood…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clise Investment Co. v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Cannon v. Oregon Moline Plow Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Foss v. Golden Rule BakeryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Brinnon Logging Co. v. Carlsborg Mill & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Pickford v. BorlandWashington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wenatchee Production Credit Ass'n v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Irwin v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API